{"id":1153,"date":"2012-03-09T14:59:07","date_gmt":"2012-03-09T04:59:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/?p=1103"},"modified":"2012-04-10T17:25:59","modified_gmt":"2012-04-10T07:25:59","slug":"does-the-australians-paywall-affect-link-sharing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/2012\/03\/09\/does-the-australians-paywall-affect-link-sharing\/","title":{"rendered":"Does The Australian\u2019s Paywall Affect Link Sharing?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There will be another post on the continuing Queensland election campaign soon, but before we get to that, I wanted to push out another quick snippet of analysis which I\u2019ve been hoping to get to for some time. For several months now, we\u2019ve been capturing tweets which include links to a number of major Australian news and opinion sites. We\u2019re able to capture such tweets even if the links are wrapped in one or more layers of URL shortening (via <em>bit.ly<\/em>, <em>t.co<\/em>, etc.) \u2013 so even if the tweet itself reads something like<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Opposition gets Malaysia deal wrong <a href=\"http:\/\/t.co\/DH3quv86\">http:\/\/t.co\/DH3quv86<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>it will be included in our dataset.<\/p>\n<p>(In fact, just to work through this example, here\u2019s how that link resolves: <a href=\"http:\/\/t.co\/DH3quv86\">http:\/\/t.co\/DH3quv86<\/a> &gt; <a href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/omcBt0\">http:\/\/bit.ly\/omcBt0<\/a> &gt; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=X&amp;q=http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/opposition-gets-malaysia-deal-wrong\/story-e6frgd0x-1226137247377&amp;ct=ga&amp;cad=CAcQARgAIAAoATAAOABAm_jC8wRIAlAAWABiBWVuLVVT&amp;cd=GuZ8wAwkEaQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFJehe4mpkMiFiNCWt8Ey9kWT42jw&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter\">http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=X&amp;q=http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/opposition-gets-malaysia-deal-wrong\/story-e6frgd0x-1226137247377&amp;ct=ga&amp;cad=CAcQARgAIAAoATAAOABAm_jC8wRIAlAAWABiBWVuLVVT&amp;cd=GuZ8wAwkEaQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFJehe4mpkMiFiNCWt8Ey9kWT42jw&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter<\/a> &gt; <a title=\"http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/opposition-gets-malaysia-deal-wrong\/story-e6frgd0x-1226137247377\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/opposition-gets-malaysia-deal-wrong\/story-e6frgd0x-1226137247377\">http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/opposition-gets-malaysia-deal-wrong\/story-e6frgd0x-1226137247377<\/a>. That\u2019s a lot of unshortening\u2026)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m not yet able to do a great deal of comparative work across multiple Australian news sites, simply because (as you can see from the example above) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/2012\/02\/10\/resolving-short-urls-a-new-approach\/\">unshortening Twitter links<\/a> takes a substantial amount of time. However, there\u2019s one particular question which I\u2019ve been very curious about: do our data show any evidence of changed usage following <em>The Australian\u2019<\/em>s decision to place some of its content behind a paywall? There\u2019s been a lot of conjecture about whether such paywalls actually work \u2013 for other NewsCorp titles, they\u2019ve been claimed to have failed (the company itself won\u2019t release any real figures beyond initial sign-ups, of course). So, is there anything we can say about the Australian situation?<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Oz<\/em>\u2019s paywall <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/media\/the-australian-paywall-to-launch-monday\/story-e6frg996-1226171691697\">was introduced on Monday 24 October 2011<\/a>, and follows a \u2018freemium\u2019 model: the site offers free access to generic news, but restricts unpaid access to what <em>The Australian<\/em> describes as its premium content: \u201canalysis, opinion and more specialist material\u201d. In particular, it limits click-throughs from other platforms: the paywall allows \u201caccess up to five premium-content stories a day via Google and \u2026 one free click-through from social media site Facebook.\u201d <em>Twitter<\/em> and <em>LinkedIn<\/em> users get no such limited free access at all, apparently.<\/p>\n<p>This mixed-access model doesn\u2019t make measuring the real impact of the paywall any easier. However, as a shortcut, we can examine the number of links to articles in the paper\u2019s \u2018Opinion\u2019 section \u2013 the majority of which are paywalled. Links to such articles will usually include \u2018\/opinion\u2019 somewhere in the URL \u2013 and so, with these <em>caveat<\/em>s, here are some figures on the amount of such links being shared over the past few months. To adjust for day-to-day variations, I\u2019m providing aggregate figures for each calendar week here:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/image.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: inline; border-width: 0px;\" title=\"image\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/image_thumb.png\" alt=\"image\" width=\"1028\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>24 October 2011, the day the paywall was introduced, marks the start of calendar week 43 \u2013 and we do indeed see a marked drop in links being shared. Even adjusting for seasonal variations as we enter the long Australian summer lull (and ignoring weeks 50\/2011, when we suffered some server trouble, and 0\/2012, which consists of only one day), the contrast is clear. During weeks 38-42 (19 Sep. to 23 Oct. 2011), our dataset contains an average of 975 \u2018Opinion\u2019 section links per week; during weeks 4-8 (23 Jan. to 26 Feb.), that average has shrunk to 486. Remember in all of this that <em>some<\/em> \u2018Opinion\u2019 links did remain freely available, of course \u2013 so a more comprehensive paywall would be likely to reduce numbers even more.<\/p>\n<p>The picture becomes even clearer when we focus only on retweets. More so than through original tweets linking to a given article, it is through retweets of those tweets that the article is circulated widely, and gains greater exposure and (potentially) impact \u2013 but if the link in the original tweet is paywalled, who (other than fellow paying subscribers to the Website) are likely to retweet it? Not many, as it turns out:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/image1.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: inline; border-width: 0px;\" title=\"image\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mappingonlinepublics.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/image_thumb1.png\" alt=\"image\" width=\"1028\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The average number of retweets linking to \u2018Opinion\u2019 pieces changes from around 368 per week in the first five weeks of our timeframe to a meagre 90 in the last five weeks, with week 43 showing a steep drop. The usual disclaimers apply here: our method of capturing tweets using <em>yourTwapperkeeper<\/em> will only capture <em>manual<\/em> retweets (and I\u2019ve filtered for tweets in the format \u201cRT @<em>username<\/em>\u201d to generate the graph above); we have no data about \u2018button\u2019 retweets, but it seems highly likely that the drop-off pattern will be very similar.<\/p>\n<p>This, to me, shows the impact of the paywall most obviously. Those with access to the full articles might still tweet about them (and presumably, by extension, share them on <em>Facebook<\/em> and elsewhere) \u2013 but if their social media friends and followers can no longer access those articles, they\u2019re also no longer going to re-share those links to their own networks of connections. By paywalling its opinion pieces, <em>The Australian<\/em> is effectively removing them from wider circulation. If the intention of the paywall is to shut out the users of <em>Twitter<\/em> and other social media platforms \u2013 mission accomplished. But if by doing so <em>The Australian<\/em> aims to encourage those users to sign up for premium access themselves, I doubt that\u2019s working\u2026<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There will be another post on the continuing Queensland election campaign soon, but before we get to that, I wanted to push out another quick snippet of analysis which I\u2019ve been hoping to get to for some time. For several months now, we\u2019ve been capturing tweets which include links to a number of major Australian &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/2012\/03\/09\/does-the-australians-paywall-affect-link-sharing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Does The Australian\u2019s Paywall Affect Link Sharing?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1329,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[180,173,8],"tags":[181,182,11,68,298],"class_list":["post-1153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","category-politics-2","category-twitter","tag-link-sharing","tag-paywall","tag-politics","tag-the-australian","tag-twitter","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1153\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mappingonlinepublics.net\/dev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}